AH578S

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION

 

 

BETWEEN

 

 

CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY

(the “Company”)

 

 

AND

 

 

TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE

(the “Teamsters”)

 

 

UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION

(the “UTU”)

 

 

RE: PRAIRIE NORTH LINE

 

 

Sole Arbitrator:                      Michel G. Picher

 

 

Appearing For The Unions:

      Michael Church                   – Counsel, Toronto

      Bruce Willows                      – General Chairman, TCRC, Edmonton

      Robert Thompson                – General Chairperson, UTU, Edmonton

      Garth Bates                           – Vice-President / Canadian Legislative Director, UTU, Ottawa

      Roland Hackl                        – Advisor / Witness, Saskatoon

      Roy McNally                         – Local Chairman, TCRC, Humbolt

      Ivan Galandy                        – Local Chairman, TCRC, Canora

 

Appearing For The Company:

      Doug VanCauwenbergh    – Director, Labour Relations, Edmonton

      Basil Laidlaw                        – Manager, Labour Relations, Edmonton

      Jim Newton                           – Superintendent, Saskatoon

 

 

A hearing in this matter was held in Montreal on July 7, 2008 and a supplementary hearing was held in Montreal on November 1, 2008.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AWARD

 

 

Following the award herein dated July  17, 2008 the parties have been unable to agree on the implementation of the Arbitrator’s award.  A supplementary hearing was therefore convened to hear their representations.

 

Having regard to the submissions of the parties, and for the purposes of clarity, the Arbitrator rules as follows:

1) – The retirement credits to be offered, totalling six in number, shall be enhanced retirement credits on the “VIA formula” which are to be made available to employees who satisfy the 55/85 formula for eligibility.

2) - To the extent that all or any of the credits are not claimed and taken up by eligible employees, the parties shall discuss the alternative of a bridging formula for more junior employees.  Should they be unable to agree on an appropriate bridging formula, the matter may be returned to the Arbitrator for final determination.

 

I continue to retain jurisdiction in this matter.

 

Dated at Ottawa this 4th day of December, 2008

 

                                                            ___________________________________

                                                                                            Michel G. Picher

                                                                                                 Arbitrator