Heard at Montreal, Wednesday 13 January 1988

Concerning

And

Interpretation of Article 45.01.

The Union grieved that the Railway has violated Article 45.01 of the Collective Agreement by not adding one additional brakeman when transporting dolomite in ore cars on one ore train

The Railway contends that it complied with all the provisions of the Collective Agreement.

There appeared on behalf of the Company:

D. Manzo – Counsel, Montreal

J. Sirois – Trainmaster, Sept-Îles

K. D. Turiff – Superintendant, Maintenance of Equipment, Sept-Îles

A. Belliveau – Manager, Human Ressources, Sept-Îles

J. Rondeau – Labour Relations Officer, Sept-Îles

J. Y. Nadeau – Superintendant, Transportation, Sept- Îles

P. Caouette – Observer

And on behalf of the Union:

R. Cleary – Counsel, Montreal

R. L. Proulx – Vice-President, Ottawa

W. G. Scarrow – General Chairman, Sarnia

For the reasons given in CROA 1742, the grievance must be dismissed.