CANADIAN
RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION
& DISPUTE RESOLUTION
CASE NO. 3981
Heard in
concerning
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
and
TEAMSTERS
EX PARTE
DISPUTE:
Assessment
of written reprimand to Conductor M. Currier of
COMPANY’S STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
On
The grievor was required to provide an employee statement with respect to booking sick while on call and was subsequently assessed a written reprimand.
The
The Company
disagrees with the
FOR THE COMPANY:
(SGD.) P. PAYNE
FOR: DIRECTOR, LABOUR RELATIONS
There appeared on behalf of the Company:
P. Payne –
Manager, Labour Relations,
K. Morris –
Sr. Manager, Labour Relations,
M. Merson –
Assistant Superintendent Transportation,
A. Egey-Samu –
Risk Management Officer,
R. Baker –
Trainmaster,
D. Gagné – Sr.
Manager, Labour Relations,
There appeared on behalf of the
M. A. Church –
Counsel,
B. R. Boechler –
General Chairman,
R. A. Hackl –
Vice-General Chairman,
A. W. Franko –
Vice-General Chairman,
M. Currier – Grievor
AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR
The record
before the Arbitrator confirms, without controversy, that the grievor made
himself available for call, in the sense that he had not booked off, when he
was called for assignment Q11251-18 on
The Arbitrator accepts that the phrase “on call” in the foregoing notation connotes actually refusing to work by booking sick at the moment the employee is called, which occurred in the case at hand. In the result, the discipline assessed against the grievor was not for having booked sick, but rather for having booked sick only when he received his call to work. The expectation of the Company is that an employee who is not fit to work should advise the employer without delay, and in particular should not await the moment of an actual call to work, as that may cause substantial disruption to the efficiency of operations.
The Arbitrator
cannot accept the submission of the
In the result I am satisfied that the Company did have just cause to assess discipline against the grievor, and that on a first infraction of this kind the registering of a written reprimand was appropriate. The grievance must therefore be dismissed.
ARBITRATOR