CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION
& DISPUTE RESOLUTION
CASE NO. 4005
Heard in
Concerning
VIA RAIL CANADA INC.
And
TEAMSTERS
DISPUTE:
The assessment of a six (6) month suspension of Locomotive Engineer Peter Kozusko.
JOINT STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
On
The
The
The Corporation maintains that Mr. Kozusko failed to comply with CROR rules and also failed to manually protect a public crossing at grade. The Corporation submits that in the past Mr. Kozusko was assessed discipline for similar rule violations. Under the circumstances the Corporation considers the assessment of discipline warranted and appropriate.
FOR
THE
(SGD.) WM. MICHAEL (SGD.) D. STROKA
GENERAL CHAIRMAN SENIOR ADVISOR, LABOUR RELATIONS
There appeared on behalf of the Corporation:
D. Stroka
Senior Advisor, Labour Relations,
W. Buckley
Manager, Train Operations,
B. A. Blair
Senior Advisor, Labour Relations,
J. Mailhot
Advisor, Labour Relations,
S. Hazeltine Foreman, A&B Rail Services
There appeared on behalf of the
M. A. Church
Counsel,
Wm. Michael
General Chairman,
P. Hope Vice-General Chairman
P. Kozusko Grievor
AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR
The facts in relation to the instant case are related in CROA&DR 4004 and need not be repeated. The grievor, Locomotive Engineer Peter Kozusko, was the Operating Engineer on train 44 when it failed to stop and perform manual signalling at a public crossing, proceeding through the crossing at extremely high speed.
As in case 4004, the sole issue in the case at hand is the appropriate measure of discipline. The record discloses that while Mr. Kozusko is a long service employee, his prior discipline is cause for concern. It includes a rule 429 violation in November of 2002 and the derailment of a train in March of 2005 when he operated his train through a 15 mile per hour crossover at a speed in excess of 60 miles per hour. Additionally, he incurred discipline in 2006 for the unauthorized movement of a train at Union Station and in 2007 for backing his train over a derail, which resulted in the derailment of two cars. All of the foregoing discipline arose during his ten years of service as a locomotive engineer.
While I acknowledge that a six month suspension is extremely serious, I am not persuaded that it was excessive in all of the circumstances of the case at hand. The grievance must therefore be dismissed.
ARBITRATOR