CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION
& DISPUTE RESOLUTION

SUPPLEMENTARY AWARD TO

CASE NO. 4092

 

 

Concerning

 

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY

 

And

 

TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE
MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES DIVISION

 

 

Based on the parties’ written submissions and a conference call

 

There appeared on behalf of the Company:

M. Shannon                                    – Counsel, Calgary

M. Moran                                        – Manager, Labour Relations, Calgary

 

There appeared on behalf of the Union:

Wm. Brehl                                      – President, Ottawa

D. Brown                                        – Legal Counsel, Ottawa

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR

 

            The Union seeks interim relief in respect of the treatment of grievor Kulwat Bal. The parties’ agreement, dated October 7, 2011, required the grievor to be medically examined as a condition of his return to service. The medical examination, conducted by Addiction Medicine Specialist Dr. Paul W. Sobey, resulted in the opinion, supported by laboratory results, that the grievor has an alcohol use or addiction problem which he has not himself recognized. Dr. Sobey has established as a condition of the grievor returning to service that he complete a 30 day residential treatment program. The Union requests the Arbitrator to effectively direct the grievor’s return to work, without loss of income and without compliance with the condition established by Dr. Sobey.

 

            I am satisfied that the opinion of Dr. Sobey must be respected. Bearing in mind that the grievor seeks an eventual return to safety sensitive duties, he was diagnosed by Dr. Sobey as having alcohol addiction for which a 30 day residential treatment program is directed as a precondition to his return to work. While I appreciate that that might cause some hardship to the grievor, I am satisfied that it is not unreasonable based on the medical report finally produced as a result of the parties’ own agreement.

 

            For these reasons the Union’s request for relief is declined.

 

 

 

May ___, 2012                                                                       _______________________________

                                                                                                                  MICHEL G. PICHER

                                                                                                                       ARBITRATOR