CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION
& DISPUTE RESOLUTION

CASE NO. 4321

Heard in Montreal, July 8, 2014

 

Concerning

 

CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY

 

And

 

UNITED STEELWORKERS – LOCAL 2004

 

DISPUTE:

 

            The assessment of 20 demerit points to Mr. Manuel Ferreira’s discipline record for the failure to safely operate a CN vehicle on August 24, 2013 resulting in damage to the vehicle when it struck a post.

 

JOINT STATEMENT OF ISSUE:

 

            The Union submitted an appeal contending that the discipline assessed was not progressive and consequently was excessive. The Union’s appeal requested that the assessed discipline in the form of 20 demerit points be replaced with 10 demerit points.

            The Company disagrees with the Union’s contentions and has declined the Union’s request.

 

FOR THE UNION:                                               FOR THE COMPANY:

(SGD.) P. Jacques                                              (SGD.) B. Laidlaw

Chief Steward                                                         Manager Labour Relations

There appeared on behalf of the Company:

B. Laidlaw                                       – Manager Labour Relations, Winnipeg

R. Hasbrouck                                 – Manager Engineering, Prince George

S. Grou                                           – Senior Manager Labour Relations, Montreal

There appeared on behalf of the Union:

P. Jacques                                     – Regional Chief Steward, Edmonton

M. Ferreira                                     – Grievor, Prince George

 

AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR

            It is not disputed that the grievor, by a brief moment of inattention, caused the CN truck which he was operated on August 24, 2013 to lightly strike a post as it was proceeding downward off a ramp. It is common ground that the accident was immediately reported by the grievor and that the damage to the truck was relatively minimal and has not required any repair.

 

            In the Arbitrator’s view the assessment of twenty demerits is excessive in the circumstances. While the grievor’s error in judgement plainly left him open to discipline, I am satisfied that the assessment of ten demerits would have been sufficient, in the circumstances, to communicate to the grievor the importance of operating his vehicle with safety and due attention. The grievance is therefore allowed, in part. I direct that the discipline assessed against the grievor in relation to the incident of August 24, 2013 be reduced to ten demerits. Subject to possible correction by the parties, it appears to the Arbitrator that the instant determination, coupled with the Award in CROA&DR 4322 would adjust the grievor’s current disciplinary record to forty-nine active demerits.

 

 

 

July 14, 2014                                                                         _______________________________

                                                                                                                  MICHEL G. PICHER

                                                                                                                       ARBITRATOR